In contrast, 4K UHD resolution on a 27-inch monitor has ~163 PPI giving you even more details and space, but in this case, you’d need to scale your interface in order for small text to be readable. With 108 PPI, on the other hand, you hit the pixel density sweet spot as you get plenty of screen space as well as sharp and vivid details without having to use scaling! That’s why we don’t recommend getting a monitor larger than 25-inches for Full HD resolution. On a 27-inch monitor, the 1080p resolution offers roughly 81 PPI (Pixels Per Inch), while 1440p provides around 108 PPI.Įssentially, this means that the picture on a 27-inch 1080p monitor will be pixelated and have smudgy text and blurry details in comparison to the 1440p variant. This is where pixel density plays a key role. The best way to illustrate the difference between the two resolutions is by comparing how they look on the same-sized display, let’s say a 27-inch monitor.
So, what exactly will 1440p offer you as opposed to 1080p, at what cost, and is it worth it? 1920×1080 vs 2560×1440 – Everyday Useġ920×1080 amounts to 2,073,600 pixels while 2560×1440 or WQHD has 3,686,400 - that’s 78% more pixels! Both resolutions have a 16:9 aspect ratio. However, many users are not happy with the image quality. Moreover, it’s not very demanding on GPU - and nowadays, 1080p displays are quite affordable. If your GPU is too strong for 1080p, you should definitely invest in a 1440p display.ġ920×1080 or Full HD is still considered as the standard resolution since most content out there is in 1080p. In comparison to 1920×1080, 2560×1440 provides you with more vivid details and more screen real estate (just how much more depends on the screen size and pixels per inch), but it’s also more power-hungry when it comes to gaming.
The higher the resolution the better - granted that you can afford it and that you have a powerful enough GPU.
0 kommentar(er)
